By Bruce H. Cohen, MD, FAAN
The standard face-to-face method for the delivery of medical care provides the best means of evaluation and treatment. Nevertheless, there are various times when this type of interaction may not be necessary or possible. In these circumstances, "remote consultation" has served as an alternative in recent years.
For the scope of this discussion, the use of the term remote consultation will refer to all methods (not restricted to the use of the Internet but also to include traditional technologies of information transfer such as mail or fax) where:
There are several reasons that a remote consultation may be requested. It may be initiated by the patient (or patient's family), a primary care doctor seeking another opinion for their patient, or by a specialist' requesting additional expert assistance. In these select instances, the use of remote consultation is a "win-win-win-win" concept for the patient, their primary doctor, their neurologist, and the remote consultant. In the setting in which a treating physician is willing to take responsibility to assist in the process, appropriate reasons for remote consultation could include:
A number of issues thwarted the implementation of remote consultation when the concept arose several years ago. To avoid the suggestion that they were practicing medicine without a license, consulting physicians were advised that they should have a medical license in the state where the patient lived. Secondly, there was the concern that the patient or patient's family would not have the background necessary to formulate the reason for consultation, ask critical questions, or have the resources to acquire and deliver only the pertinent parts of the medical record. Finally, the physicians providing the remote consultation were not part of the patient's medical team never having met the patient in person and suddenly found themselves at the receiving end of seemingly endless phone calls and questions, without the ability to get reimbursed for their additional time.
These issues resolve when the request for the service comes specifically from the physician caring for the patient. Even if the patient initiated the remote consultation (and would usually receive a copy of the opinion), the official reporting relationship was physician-to-physician without the consultant physician ever establishing a direct patient-physician relationship. Under this stipulation, the consulting physician is providing, in effect, a professional service outside of a patient-physician interaction. As such, the service has a defined beginning and end.
The key components of such a consultation require that:
Remote consultations have limited applications but, when used appropriately, can be of value to all parties involved. Importantly, the patient must understand the limitations of the consultation and the consulting physicians should prepare a summary letter, also making sure the consultant has all the pertinent data. However, the value of this service is ultimately the responsibility of the remote expert.
Read a related article from Neurology Now®.
Within the past 24 months, the author received personal compensation from Transgenomic, Inc., for speaking and serving on a scientific advisory board. Dr. Cohen has also served as an expert witness and given depositions on several legal cases, and has received 15% salary support over the last five years from a Chairman's Grant, Children's Oncology Group, for his participation as chairman of this committee.